this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16700 readers
157 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

A lot more people than that astronaut are going to see the post reply, though. A lot of them probably haven't taken a thermodynamics lesson.

Sorry, I didn't mean to mansplain that to you just now. Just wanted future readers to consider another angle.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A lot of them probably haven't taken a thermodynamics lesson.

Sure, but in that case the replier could've phrased their response as such. As it stands they're addressing the poster, not other people seeing the exchange.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure, but in that case the replier could've phrased their response as such.

But like if we're being super duper real for a sec, who gives a shit? It's such a waste of energy and won't change anything to pick meaningless social media posts apart. He made a fair point, I choose not to interpret it beyond that.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, you choose not to interpret it beyond that because to you it's something other people are talking about. To someone who experiences this regularly it can apparently get really annoying, hence the negative reactions.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure he didn't make a fair point. I haven't taken any thermodynamics classes, but I think the word "spontaneous" means something more specific in this context and is technically accurate.

He's trying to one up her by using the common definition.

So he's wrong on multiple levels here, and there's no reason to pick apart the meaningless social media post accusing him of mansplaining.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The term spontaneous in thermodynamics refers to processes that occur without changes to the system. That doesn't really apply here. "Spontaneous" boiling otherwise makes sense in the context of superheated water that starts boiling at the slightest nudge. This might very well be what she meant. I'm not even trying to say he proved her wrong. I'm saying he added insightful information. His conversation skills could use some work but accusing him of anything beyond that is a reach in my opinion.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty sure it's a reaction without any external energy input, which this is, but again, I'm no astronaut.