this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
558 points (94.3% liked)

Political Memes

9431 readers
3582 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Grassroots organization will save us.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 119 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Absolutely vote for whatever your personal issue is in the primary. Make your voice heard and let the candidates know about it.

Come general election, you vote against the Nazi. I don't give a fuck if the Dem doesn't like your issue, I'll even donate to change their mind, but damn well show up and vote for them.

[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Come general election, you vote against the Nazi. I don't give a fuck if the Dem doesn't like your issue, I'll even donate to change their mind, but damn well show up and vote for them.

Unless he’s Zohran, then we clutch pearls and support the corrupt creepy predator guy.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've heard this brought up a lot. First of all, fuck Cuomo. Any rational person should be supporting Zohran over any of the other candidates.

But also, is there an actual worry about the ticket getting split or non-votes and allowing the Republican to win? That's essentially what "vote Blue" is about.

Also, progressives have one candidate that is obviously better than the alternative, even if they don't like both. Moderates aren't necessarily convinced. It's just a different argument.

Although, if they are and they still just don't like them, I'm 100% telling them to get off their ass and vote to stop the nazis.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

is there an actual worry about the ticket getting split or non-votes and allowing the Republican to win

Nope. The Republican candidate is perennial loser and insanely racist vigilante Curtis Sliwa. Nobody thinks he has a chance, including himself. He's purely in it for the PR and donations.

That's essentially what "vote Blue" is about.

Nope. That's their excuse to force "electable" (read: right wing and corrupt) candidates on voters who would much rather have someone who'll faithfully represent their wants and needs but scared of getting someone even worse.

Adams the fascist cop (but I repeat myself) won his primaries by a fraction of a percentage (after a full court press propaganda campaign on his behalf by both major parties and all NYC-based MSM) and they were immediately falling over each other to declare him "the future of the party"

Mamdani beats the establishment favorite in a surprise landslide and they're all pretending that he's a communist terrorist that somehow snuck in against the will of everyone.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The "Vote Blue No Matter Who" is in fact about keeping Republicans out of power. I've been telling people to vote blue no matter who in reference to Mamdani, who is supported by the vast majority of state and federal democrats and trouncing all other candidates combined in polls including the Trump supporting third party Cuomo.

The reason there is a perceived rift is because monied powers such as Israel and China WANT there to be a rift.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If that's what it is about it failed. We need to move on.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, it is failing, because people aren't doing it, and the result is Republicans keep winningm

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's not going to change unless the DNC changes first.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I mean some are, and their support of Cuomo is worthy of condemnation. But it's worth pointing out 'vote blue no matter who' cuts both ways and 100% it means Mamdani.

Broadly I hate the whole 'party' system and getting stuck with a 'team sport' mentality, but at least for now, for the national races I have to be pragmatic and steer into the skid of party politics. The local/state level I can afford to be more nuanced as for now, neither big party is as scary locally as the GOP is federally.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And because there are way more fascist friendly neoliberals than there are progressives it will never be someone you actually want to vote for.

This has been the pattern for my entire life and expecting this stupid country full of idiots to change is a recipe for disappointment.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Isn't that how democracy works? You try to convince the greatest number of people to agree with you, and if they don't, you lose? You can try to change the center of the curve, but if you're way over in "property is theft" land, and the greater number of people are in "healthcare should be cheap if not free," then that's going to be the policy that wins. You can be upset that more people don't agree with you, but that's what primaries are for.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes which is why I hate it and want to leave.

Except everywhere is like this because humans are unnecessarily complicated.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Sure, but Gavin Newsom might very well also be a Nazi. If you're from California, then you're probably aware that he's not exactly defending the the sanctuary state that he's been charged to lead. He's also kind of giving mayors carte blanche (and State-level support) to "clean up" homeless encampments, and he's publicly stated that he doesn't believe that "trans athletes should be allowed to compete against girls" in and interview with Charlie Kirk, and then recently doubled down on that.

So what do you do when both Candidates want to fuck the world?

Obviously the fascist party is accelerating things quickly, but the Democrats aren't doing anything to slow it down. Just as in every single case of a fascist takeover ever, the liberals enable the fascists. They keep trying to shift to the right to "capture voters" which literally has never worked, but they keep trying. Why?

[–] yamper@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

i can't believe after the dissolution of checks and balances and the ongoing kidnapping of hispanic people nationwide we're still having this conversation.

obviously newsom is actively awful. but calling it "both candidates want to fuck the world" is so narrow-minded knowing everything that is happening to america every day right now.

it's frustrating to be an american and be given two choices who both suck. one choice sucks so much more. not playing along in this fucked up democracy puts american people in danger.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don't think "sucks so much more" is all that accurate though. Both candidates do want to fuck the world.

Where were the checks and balances when the Democrats were Drone-Striking kids? Where were the checks and balances when the Democrats were mass-deporting people? Where were the Checks and balances for torture programs, killing americans, giving our tax money to their rich friends, building out surveillance programs, backing a genocide, etc?

Yes, one side is worse, but the supposed "opposition" is doing everything they can to get as close to the worse side as they can.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There are no small wins anymore. Harm reduction is important, but it's also important to understand what is happening right now. That's all I'm saying. The Democrats will not be your salvation, they will be your slow demise. The Republicans will be your quick demise. People need to take to the streets, not the ballots. If you can't see that, then you're still living in the past. Listen to yourself: "compete dissolution of checks and balances" but you still think we can reform it all better?

C'mon, you don't seem to be that out of the loop. Surely you get it by now? I don't think you deserve to have a master

[–] piefood@feddit.online 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure you understand my position. I'm against the Democrats and the Republicans. I don't think voting will be our solution. I'm pretty sure that I never said we can reform it, and I think we're gonna have to tear it all down and start over.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

Their comment reads like they responded to the wrong person.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Responded to the wrong person. Sorry about that

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

not the ballots

Go to the ballots and vote for who you want. Will it be sufficient, dunno, but it is absolutely needed to put in at least that effort.

Historically non-democratic means of overthrowing a previously democratic systems do not end well...

[–] yamper@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i hope your clean hands can bring home all of the people ICE disappeared

[–] piefood@feddit.online 5 points 2 weeks ago

You mean the organization that Obama and Biden supported, and used to disappear people?

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

not playing along in this fucked up democracy puts american people in danger.

Yet playing along seems to have led to fascism. Voting clearly is not enough, we have to take action outside of the system. Our fucked up electoral system could not be relied upon before and it definitely can't now with a fascist in office doing everything he can to rig it in his favor. We need more people to become disillusioned with our electoral system because it is dead now, and believing in the fantasy that we can vote our way out of fascism isn't going to do anyone any favors.

[–] yamper@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
  1. i am pragmatic enough to understand how to do my best to reduce the harm done on my innocent countrymen
  2. i can do this while supporting grassroots initiatives to change the power structure.

what's the outcome of mass disillusionment? are the Cool Socialists ready to replace the electoral system? because to me it seems way more likely that the Worse Fascists will benefit the most from mass disillusionment.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

I also support harm reduction and I practice it at the ballot box, I just don't think there is anything to gain by hammering people over the heads trying to sell them on harm reduction. It's completely ineffective at inspiring people to the kind of mass coordinated action that is required.

what's the outcome of mass disillusionment?

Disillusionment is effective at inspiring action, provided you can get people past the apathy stage. The fact is people are being disillusioned - for good reason - and fighting it is counterproductive. So long as you're focused on trying to pull people back to the center for the sake of harm reduction, you're ceding the populist narrative to the fascists.

are the Cool Socialists ready to replace the electoral system?

Absolutely not, which is why more people need to organize, and before they will be willing to organize they have to become disillusioned with the system.

because to me it seems way more likely that the Worse Fascists will benefit the most from mass disillusionment.

They will if we don't meet people where they're at like they're doing.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

One person thinks trans people shouldn't be allowed to compete in sports.

The other person thinks that trans people shouldn't be allowed to live.

Please help I can't figure out how these two are different

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

There is no difference. One side is just more honest

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'll take the side that dishonestly gives trans people their rights except for sports.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

I can't believe this is such a hard thing for people to understand.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

I mean yeah if you close your eyes everything looks the same

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm willing to give up my non existent dreams of Basketball Stardom to ensure my survival

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

and then recently doubled down on that

Wait seriously? I was really hoping he would do the opposite and call it a "lapse in judgement"

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Your heuristic is easy to beat. A Nazi just needs to run as a Democrat, hide their true feelings until the general election, and they can trick you into voting for them every time.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

You must be working for Fetterman

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Well they can trick you into voting for them the first time, anyways

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And why is this even a conversation now? There is literally no reason for anyone to care about the 2028 election. I mean hell, in all likelihood you won't even get to have real elections in 2028 at this rate, so now in 2025 go do something about it.

I'll even donate to change their mind,

That... makes no sense.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Giving politicians money to change their mind is straight up how Dems operate. They're barely even shy about it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah but you need a lot of zeros and commas on that check for them to give a damn

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Less than you'd think, but hey - they didn't say how much they were gonna spend.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Less than I think is still more than I can spare.

But, hey, good to know that our politics are hopelessly corrupt and can be purchased for mere hundreds of thousands of dollars and not millions.

I’m sure those poor millionaires are happy about that.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Tens, actually. But yeah

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Nah i'm done playing this no sensical game. If I vote, it's for PSL and any other third party option. Not like voting for a Dem in my state of Missouri will do anything so might as well vote for who I actually want to support and stop doing the "hold your nose and vote for the slightly less bigoted fascist".

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I used to think the same until Georgia flipped blue for Biden.

It's possible and better then the alternative. Hell if your vote even just helps flip a house seat it is a drastic improvement

load more comments (5 replies)