this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
404 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25350 readers
2200 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Podcast host Joshua Haymes voices range of extreme views and says liberalism a greater threat to US than neo-Nazism

The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has repeatedly endorsed the Reformation Red Pill podcast, and has appeared on four episodes. But the former pastor who hosts the show, and who attends Hegseth’s theocratic church, has voiced a range of extreme positions in recent months on issues including Ice raids, capital punishment, the racist “great replacement” theory, adultery and neo-Nazism.

The revelations come on top of recent media reports focused on Hegseth also boosting a video of Douglas Wilson and other Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC) pastors arguing that women should lose the vote in the United States. They also follow previous revelations about Hegseth’s links to or apparent sympathies for Christian nationalist positions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Leviticus 19:33-34

When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God

Exodus 22:21

Do not mistreat or oppress a foreigner, for you were foreigners in Egypt.

Deuteronomy 4:2

Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the Lord your God that I give you.

Seems pretty straightforward to me.

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

before i whip this out on the family, i know the first thing they'll ask, "is that the old testament?"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love how they pull that nonsense, when it's convenient. But then want the "ten commandments" put up on public land, etc....derrrrrrrp.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

It’s almost as if they don’t have any actual beliefs and the rest of you should stop treating them like they do.

I enjoy asking people to name all ten commandments whenever they bring that shit up - they can never do it. "Uhhhhhh ... do not cover thy ass?"

[–] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd respond that the parable of the Good Samaritan is specifically showing a "foreigner" (eh, nuance is hard) as the only person who helped the injured man, but that requires critical thinking and some historical context, so basically useless...

the only person who helped the injured man

They took er jobs!

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Matthew 5:17-20

17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19 Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

Jesus himself literally says follow the law (of Moses, OT shit) until heaven and earth fucking die, and anyone that doesn't follow it won't see heaven.

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

thanks for this! I will definitely be sure to keep that in the utility belt!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I always remember the "jot and tittle" thing.

Especially when some xtian starts up with me about a vegetarian diet based on that Matthew quote about "it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person" as if I give two flying fucks what "the" bible says about morality or diet anyway...but I'll ask them about why they eat pork and shellfish and they'll use the "but that's the OT" thing.

If they know a thing or two about old worn out chestnuts, they'll claim they have some "new covenant" with their god and that things like that are only "rabbinical law". But, whoops, his character is made to say that entire "jot and tittle" business! Uh-oh, sorry, no pork chops, guys. And no cheeseburgers! Hey, it's YOUR holy text, not mine...

I've had two conversations like this where the xtian pulled out that dumb Matthew quote when they find out I'm vegetarian (IRL, I don't really share this unless necessary in group settings, and I definitely don't proselytize) - not sure how they started applying that to vegetarians, but it seems to be a thing? I don't run in evangelical circles, but I imagine one of their thought leaders started with that...anyway, they didn't like me pointing out the jot and tittle thing. Doesn't really leave much wiggle room despite the claims of the "new covenant" and jacking your jaw about "rabbinical law".

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Check out Deconstruction zone and DZDebates on YouTube. Guy was a Christian for 20 years, went to seminary, learned greek and biblical Hebrew so he could read the Bible in the original languages, and through his study became an atheist. He is the least "debate-lord" atheist I've seen and has genuinely engaging conversations with people when they're polite. When they're belligerent though he roasts them with Bible verses.

[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 20 hours ago

Reading the bible page by page, front to back made me an atheist. Reading it all the second time gave me the data points I need to rip right through any argument I have ever heard them use.

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

beautiful, thank you!

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Just tell them to be Jews or Muslims if they don't like the new testament

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 day ago

It's quite a leap to assume that any of these people have actually read the bible.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Surprised you didn't mention Jesus and his family fleeing Judea to save him when Herod ordered all male children killed