this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
178 points (98.4% liked)
science
21544 readers
414 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I definitely do not care about dicing an onion uniformly, but I read and enjoyed the entire analysis.
All of the diagrams are of a cross-section of the middle of an onion. You know, it being round and all, it naively makes a lot of sense to assume that's going to be ok as a model for the entire onion.
But ... I find myself curious ... if the solution is to cut to an angle below the onion, and the article did point out that a few pieces along the bottom would be mismatched ... It seems that we are overlooking the top and bottom of the onion where sections are going to get some really weird looking cuts.
They say, "This is an onion. (Well, a simplified cross-section of one.)"
... No. No that is not an onion. Its not that they've chosen an easy problem, but the approximation used here is not an onion.