People Twitter

7990 readers

1850 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

863

Who's going to tell me how to eat though? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 days ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It definitely is worse. Depending on which hits your doctor uses, there is legit medical knowledge on the internet, while chatgpt will just make stuff up.

I know a lot of young people see no difference between chatgpting something and googling it, and google has become really awful, but there is still a huge difference, since you can make google results better by using your brain and source criticism, while there is no such option with chatgpt.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

You can prompt or customize chat to give sources. I include prompts like "check for coherence, scientific accuracy" etc. too, depending on what I'm using it for.