this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
77 points (93.3% liked)

Progressive Politics

3089 readers
505 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’d rather we all have to suffer instead of some of us getting out.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we had the position of power to force those states out we'd have a position of power to force them on the right path

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Avoiding.

If a state had a local popular vote to split and it passed, then a national vote to split was done—would you vote to allow that state to split?

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The premise was kicking out, not a peaceful split. If they voted on it, I would vote against it. I'd rather do every effort to bring them back from oppressive authoritarianism and prevent them from being worse.

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Including throwing other people under the bus. Nice. I’ll bet you’d like to prevent people from leaving the country too. Less blue voters. Gotta make them stay.

I think you like watching people suffer.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, not including throwing other people under the bench. That's what YOU are suggesting, is throwing every gay in texas under the bus.

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

The house is burning down whether you like it or not. There is nothing we can do about it. Some of us should be able to survive. Don’t lock the door and force us all to burn.