this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
284 points (99.7% liked)

politics

25197 readers
2799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Time to show up at their house?...

knock knock

Hi, your extended car warranty has expired, would you care to talk to your constituents about it? Pst... thats me.

makes awkward eye contact with them

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One way ticket to criminal trespass I'm sure

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends on how exactly the person approaches the house. If they go up and just start screaming in their face, they could probably be trespassed, but there's this legal principle known as "implied license," which essentially just means that if you have a way to enter your property, you've sort of implied that you're allowing people to go there for legitimate purposes, such as getting your attention, delivering mail, soliciting (unless a sign specifies otherwise), etc.

So even if they had a sign saying "no tresspassing," if their neighbor were to walk over and knock on their door to let them know their back gate was left open, that wouldn't be tresspassing, because it's implied that they still are allowing people to walk on the footpath to their door, to get their attention for any purpose deemed reasonable or legitimate.

As a public servant, someone coming up to your door and trying to tell you something, or a journalist coming up to ask you some questions, could very well be considered covered by implied license, and thus not tresspassing, though I'm sure the courts would have to debate that a lot to actually determine if that's the case given the situation.

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Counterpoint - Castle Doctrine. Hard to defend yourself with Implied License when you're full of buckshot.

Countercounterpoint - Siege Doctrine. Kinda hard to be a cowardly cunt and fill folks with buckshot when grapeshot is being unloaded into your house.

If these gormless cowards keep hiding they've quite frankly have willingly given up their privileges to life.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

K, but the laws don't matter anymore to anybody in government. So, why would I care about a little trespassing?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So, why would I care about a little trespassing?

Because you're poor, and laws still apply to you.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Nah, if they don't care, I don't either.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the fine article people were at the home of their representative.

Across the street was the house of Rep. Carol Miller, R-W.Va. The imposing brick home was darkened, the curtains were drawn. No car was visible in the driveway. But for the assembled, it was a last ditch effort to get some kind of attention from the Congresswoman.