this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
566 points (99.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

27490 readers
1434 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
anzo@programming.dev
Feyter@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
566
CSS Gardening (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by bleistift2@sopuli.xyz to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's so the position: absolute for .leaves works relative to .tree. The implication is that .leaves is a descendant of .tree.

position: absolute looks for the nearest ancestor with a set position in order to determine its own positioning context. Otherwise the absolute positioning would basically be relative to the viewport. If the position: relative was missing, the leaves would be against the bottom edge of the image.

source

edit: I mean .leaves, not .branch