this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
808 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

7992 readers
796 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nobody said that. They were simply correcting the misconception that autism is bad.

[–] Senal@programming.dev -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And i was correcting the misconception that just because someone is neurodivergent doesn't make them immune to being an arsehole.

Neurodivergent people are people, with all that entails.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nobody said autism is bad (in the chain im replying to), but here we are.

Two statements that never happened with two corrections that aren't needed apparently.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They did say autism was bad. That’s the whole point of the correction. Are you just dead set on being an asshole?

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The entire post was :

I’m just glad they got a power hungry, austistic lunatic in charge now, so everyone can see this is absolutely the end game, before this becomes normalized and people like me get called retarded for not wanting a car that can be remote deactivated.

Point at where the person said autism was bad and i'll drop it.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you cannot parse “power hungry autistic lunatic” as having negative connotations then I’m not sure what I could ever attempt to discuss with you.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you want to pretend your interpretation of three descriptors is universal then i'm not sure discussion is what you are looking for.

Two potentially (probably) negative and one neutral, to me, but what do i know , you are the arbiter of correct interpretations after all.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao yes, that’s right. Autistic is just mentioned neutrally in a list. Can’t make this shit up.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I shall defer to your interpretation, absolute arbiter of meaning.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣