this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
125 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48983 readers
2313 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't think it's comparable. Climate change is far more dire and time sensitive.

[–] thatkomputerkat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, the proliferation of pfas everywhere is pretty detrimental to life on this planet. In general it is the result of the same kind of industrial criminal negligence and weaksauce regulations.

We really should have tackled both issues decades ago but yay line go up right now, so fuck the future.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

PFAS is a massive problem certainly worth tackling, but as bad as it is, I don't think it's an existential threat with a very short time window to prevent devastation of the species like climate change is.

Theoretically there's no reason we can't tackle both problems at once, but personally I would advocate pumping as much resources as humanly possible into preventing climate change first, if that's the only way politicians will deal with it.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter how warm the earth gets if the soil and water is so polluted we cannot grow crops

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

The exact effect of these chemicals is still not known. Microplastics seem capable of limiting crop yields, so that's certainly a horrific issue combined with reduced yields from climate change as well. But chemicals in general, as horrific as they are, are not quite an existential threat capable of completely destroying our ability to grow food.

Current farming practices depleting topsoil is a bigger threat to food production than chemicals, generally, except for pesticides likely causing the collapse of the bee population, which is an existential threat.