this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
243 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

17548 readers
1170 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Who was at risk of being shocked?

If it was the person being executed: Isn't that the whole idea?

edit: Or maybe they were just worried that the defibrilator would have prevented him from dying. 🤔

[–] modus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I think the point of concern is that it prolonged the entire procedure. His heart was simultaneously being chemically stopped and electrically jump-started.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

The defibrillator might actually make it a horrible slow death. Imagine dying over and over again.

[–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, the concern was that the defibrillator was shocking his heart as his heart rate slowed down, causing unnecessary pain and distress.

There was a concern that the defibrillator would keep bringing him back to life.