Selfhosted

44503 readers

993 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

How do you like to transfer large files between friends across the internet? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by ReducedArc@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

78 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On occasion I find myself needing to send a file at least a few gigabytes in size to a friend across our slow ISPs but haven't found a satisfying solution. I usually end up creating a private torrent with the announce address of my own IP. Even though it's slow - it basically never reaches my max upload speed for some reason, it is at least resilient if there are ever any network glitches.

Does anyone else face this same challenge?

EDIT: Thank you for the awesome suggestions! I have some homework to do on these

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

> is there such a problem? honest question. But I think that might be a different issue

Yes, that is a problem. We're still in a world where you need to manually enable port forwarding in order to get better seeding for bittorrent clients, and if you have CGNAT you're SOL (short of using a VPN or something to bounce through an external host).

I don't understand, sorry. they were saying that something doesn't work as expected IPv6. but CGNAT is not used for IPv6, is it? and you don't really forward ports either, maybe you allow them through in the routercs firewall but notnsure because I don't have v6

We're still in a world where you need to manually enable port forwarding

well, you don't need to, often you can also enable the upnp function in the router so that any software can open all the ports it wants, which is a terrible idea security-wise