this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
303 points (98.4% liked)

Europe

6875 readers
884 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Godort@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I get that the implicated conclusion here is that cars are orders of magnitude more dangerous. This is true, but I wonder how much this data is being skewed because more people drive cars rather than walk.

[โ€“] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

From the numbers its sort of implied that these are not per population but rather total numbers which is generally meaningless because some areas are metropolitan and others are long country roads.

Its curious ish but not really a reasonable comparison. Who records people vs people collisions? And in how many people vs people collisions is a knife involved?

Anyway absolute numbers are not particularly interesting, per population per area sounds more useful to give real context. However i will also take this opportunity to say "fuck cars" because over this side of the pond those shitty overcompensating shit trucks with their bull bars should be banned and removed from the road. Absolute death traps and don't fit into our parking spots

[โ€“] f314@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

This is in France. Los of people walk rather than drive. It would be interesting to see the numbers adjusted for number of trips, though.

[โ€“] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think adjusting for travelled distance would give more insight.

[โ€“] f314@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I disagree. For example, you might take your car for a trip to a big box store outside of town, but you might take your bike or walk to shop for groceries at your local supermarket. So even if you adjust for number of trips, the car will naturally account for a much larger distance.

In my opinion it is much more interesting to know how likely you are to be injured or killed on any given trip than, say, every 100 km of walking or driving.

Not to say that adjusting for distance can never be useful, but in this case Iโ€™m not sure it would add as much meaning.

[โ€“] YknsNMo000@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 days ago

A lot more people than in the US but france is still pretty carbrained outside of big cities

[โ€“] copd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

You would be surprised. I would take a bet against you that collectively more distance is completed on foot than in "cars" in france

[โ€“] idefix@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I had to double-read your comment there. There is not a single able-bodied person who is not a pedestrian. However, probably only 50% of them drives.

[โ€“] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago

No they drive and that removes their pedestrian status in traffic. It is very impractical to log all accidents as "technically a pedestrian" because they had the ability to walk. The same rules apply to a tank. When it is knocked off with a drone, we don't say "oh wow a 6 pedestrian and one tractorgun kill by a toy helicopter" because once we have a term for something it means what it means and that is useful to us

[โ€“] YknsNMo000@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 days ago

https://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/transport-de-voyageurs-selon-les-modes

~80% of all travel is made in cars. If you take the moped, trucks and "unknown", they kill 99.9% of road casualties.

There is clear overrepresentation.

[โ€“] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 2 days ago

I get that the implicated conclusion here is that cars are orders of magnitude more dangerous. This is true, but I wonder how much this data is being skewed because more people drive cars rather than walk.

Another thing that would be interesting to know is some number about the scenarios in which the deaths happened.

[โ€“] django@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

How do you think people get to their cars?