this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
98 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10225 readers
337 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wonder how many decades they are gonna waffle on that.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Those chemicals are not easy to remove, especially compared to traditional water treatments. New solutions need to be developed or a new, uncontaminated source found for some areas. Reverse osmosis could probably reduce the toxic chemicals, but reverse osmosis is expesnive to install and operate and very energy intensive. Getting the toxic chemicals out is easier said than done.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There are ways that we can currently do it, not putting an imperfect system in where there currently is none is waffling. How long till we see imperfect implemented to mitigate?

I'm not touching on cost or complexities as I don't think that would be useful in this particular conversation.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Cost is an important factor. Someone has to pay for installation, maintenance etc. It needs to be clear how much is going to fall on municipalities, provinces, and feds to tackle this issue. Dumping all the costs on a municipality is unreasonable.

A partial solution could be something like a rebate for in home RO installations for drinking and cooking water. This tackles the biggest health concern while only treating a small fraction of the total water a city pumps.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Like I said we don't need those sorts of details when there is only the smell of a plan.