this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
1042 points (91.9% liked)

Political Memes

9086 readers
2243 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can't just convict someone on vibes

[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No you can't. You can however refuse to give them a job because they keep making inappropriate remarks about women and multiple women have accused them of sexual abuse, rape and harassment.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

EXACTLY. You don't need to "trust", you can look at the comments that were consistently made in regards to women, the vile behavior he engaged in, the known relationships, and the week court cases, i.e the evidence that was there in plain sight but people chose to ignore

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Fortunately pretty much everyone agrees

[–] brot@feddit.org -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not called "vibes", it's called "witness testimony" and every country on earth totally does convict people based on that

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

There was just a high profile case involving 5 NHL players that went on for years with no actual proof of a rape happening because a claim was taken seriously. They were found not guilty because in Canada the Crown has to prove a crime actually happened you don't just trust someone without proof. People are claiming they probably did it, and let's be clear they probably did, but we don't convict people for probably doing something.

(Insert someone finding an example of a clearly innocent person being convicted to claim it's the norm)