898
Resurfaced clip shows Epstein pleading the Fifth when asked if he was with Trump around underage girls
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
898 points (99.7% liked)
politics
24944 readers
2773 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Umm, the same headline everywhere, with slightly different variations, is the expected outcome from their propaganda machine. But, sure, essentially identical messaging is totally a sign it's been derailed, why didn't I see that before?;
What are you smoking, guy? Pass that shit already.
I mean, shit, we've heard all about "their base is finally cracking" a just stupid number of times already. But, sure, this crack is for real. Yup. Uh, huh.
Oh, and his supporters in Congress shutting everything down to protect him means they decided to withdraw support. Makes total sense!! And getting the ball rolling on an unpopular issue while everyone isn't paying attention totally means they want you to know it's in progress. Duh
But seriously, you fucking lost me entirely with this one....
If they (the whole Republican caucus) supported him, they could have stayed open and voted it down. Nothing that's happened has advanced their position. The committee vote wasn't improved by Trump and Johnson becoming weaker. You're too deep in the grand conspiracy theory to actually capitalize on changes in the political landscape. In your eyes, every development at every point in time is just another example of the enemy winning, so whatever happens must be what they want and it must be moving you further from your goals. But there's no winning with that mindset. You'll never see when there is an opportunity to rally workers to contact representatives in a newly chaotic political environment where they're off balance because the previous status quo of blind loyalty to leadership is in doubt.
They're not your friends and the game isn't won, none of this is a development that means we can all just sit back and wait for success, but being at maximum doom all the time means you're not prepared to take advantage of their weakness.
Yeah, sure buddy. I'm now incorrect because all the assumptions you've made about me.
Get a life