this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
31 points (89.7% liked)
science
20546 readers
716 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Try to think of how a bad actor might use what you are suggesting to steal someone's identity. The trouble with any identity verification system is not just how inconvenient it is, but also how criminals will try to abuse the system.
Some kind of entity would have to be in charge of storing and verifying the DNA data. Once that database is created, there will always be the potential for exploitation. Also consider what happens if, or more likely when, that entity changes hands and is run by new people with new agendas? That might not work out so well for the people in that database.
The government has my fingerprints and my drivers license photo. I am not interested in sharing that with any for-profit company. I would be even more resistant to anyone wanting to collect my DNA regardless of the reason.
What I was implying was something local that somehow determined the age of someone, of course such device would have to sign that info with a gov key to limit explotation.
But still everything local, but having to sign the info to make it credible I think like someone suggested a gov issued temp token would be a better solution.