this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
337 points (96.2% liked)

Greentext

6835 readers
738 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not true, "pro-life" is actually "anti-woman's life". Those people would rather have an adult person die from an ectopic pregnancy than have a clump of cancer removed.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This. Pro-life supporters don't care if the mother dies. Hell, corpses get more rights than pregnant women, because at least people can refuse to be organ donors

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you nazis have mind reading technologies now?

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Resorting to calling me a Nazi now? Thanks for telling me that you have no actual counterargument.

The Pro-Choice argument is one of bodily autonomy. If people have the right to refuse the use of their organs to save others after they are dead, then everyone should also have the right to refuse the same while they are alive.

Not only that, bans on abortion adds red tape to many procedures necessary to keep the mother alive, incpuding in situations where the fetus isn't viable. If the fetus dies in the womb and the mother doesn't naturally expel it, she needs an abortion ot it'll rot and kill here. If the zygote never fully makes it to the uterus and starts developing inside the ovarian tubes, it needs to be aborted or it will kill both the mother and the fetus.

Making it harder for pregnant women to gain access to these procedures is needlessly and ridiculously cruel.

And let's also discuss your Nazi claims: I'm pro-workers right, pro-consumer rights, pro-privacy. I think we need to increase social welfare services to help the most vulnerable of us, including some form of universal healthcare. But I'm a Nazi simply because I support the 2nd ammendment? Yeah, that bullshit. You aren't worth wasting more of my time on.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

The Pro-Choice argument is one of bodily autonomy. If people have the right to refuse the use of their organs to save others after they are dead, then everyone should also have the right to refuse the same while they are alive.

The choice is made when she gets pregnant. A slim minority of abortions are in cases of rape. Because I know pro-aborts like to bring up rare scenarios every time

Not only that, bans on abortion adds red tape to many procedures necessary to keep the mother alive, incpuding in situations where the fetus isn't viable. If the fetus dies in the womb and the mother doesn't naturally expel it, she needs an abortion ot it'll rot and kill here. If the zygote never fully makes it to the uterus and starts developing inside the ovarian tubes, it needs to be aborted or it will kill both the mother and the fetus.

Removing a dead foetus isn't murder. Of course I'm not advocating for a ban on that

You're a nazi because you're using dogwhistles by referring to humans as "lumps of cancer". That's a classic dehumanisation tactic.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -4 points 1 day ago

A foetus isn't a clump of cancer. No need to use a Eugenicist dog-whistle, Nazi.