this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15952 readers
121 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's wild that many people on Lemmy dont understand that many things, while completely and absolutely unnecessary, also bring a lot of joy to people.

Cracking a bottle of beaujolais alongside a dish made from Chinese and Korean ingredients while listening to South American vinyl on my Japanese speakers is part of the spice of life.

I get that I could live like a 12th century peasant, only consume things I grow myself and use clothing I can make by hand, but Jesus christ, that's fucking insane.

Living isnt just about living, its about knowing and enjoying other cultures and the world itself. This study sound like they'd have you live in a cave with no ac while only eating flavorless locally sourced paste.

How boring and repulsive.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's wild how you went from shipping plastic wrapped cucumbers across the world while exporting local ones, to your bougie bs...

We get it, you're a spoiled first worlder

I mean, I get that you don’t like how they talk on Lemmy about it, but the quote from the study even talks about how the surplus could be used for additional consumption and everything. Study is here

I think we all have different things we want in life and with such a big surplus there is room for most of us to regularly enjoy that. I do not believe that they argue that we will NEVER be able to enjoy different food. That is as you have mentioned not functional or good for people to work together and live together. Disregarding the many people with different cultures that have moved somewhere else.

I think the study more clearly argues that we can afford to take care of everyone on the world if we wanted to. That there is a viable way and that that way is not as you are implying necessarily a deprived space with tight margins. Because living is about more than slaving away like a 12th century peasant to accumulate more wealth for a king somewhere far off.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago

Most of what the study is proposing would be a modest decrease in living standards in developed countries, for a drastic increase in living standards everywhere else. It's not asking you to give up luxury, only for the rate of new luxury to decrease slightly as surplus is more evenly distributed.