this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
201 points (99.5% liked)

Games

40975 readers
1553 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The H1-B visa is fundamentally broken (or working exactly as intended, depending on how you look at it) though, so you apply for just under 10x as many as you need and end up with the number you want.

It's not Microsoft's fault the US Government is actively encouraging importing cheaper, average employees by using a lottery rather than filtering based on "you must earn n% more than the median income in that sector" or a similar metric to avoid reducing wages for Americans and companies using them to cut costs...

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Adding mandated wage requirements would undermine the whole H1-B program, which is great. I don't think we should allow H1-Bs for jobs that we have adequate domestic supply for and it should be a pain in the dick to get.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ok I have an idea, why don't we just pay a living wage to US tech workers whether they are immigrants or they were born and raised in the US?

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They are generally paid well over a living wage for a position that a citizen could occupy at a market wage that is even higher. Median tech job income is over $100k, twice the national average.

Hiring a citizen costs more, so profit chasing dictates hiring an immigrant that can be paid less than market rate. Hiring an immigrant under an H1-B not only is cheaper in wages, but also gives the company more power over the employee because they can fire that person and then they get deported for not being sponsored.

Hiring an H1-B at a cheaper rate also suppresses wages for citizens.

Unemployment in tech is like 3%, we don't need H1-B visa for tech jobs. We don't even need H1-Bs for the industries with the highest unemployment, they need to increase wages to attract the nearly 7 million unemployed in the US, and there are even more people that are underemployed or have given up because wages are too low across the board.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am not disputing the details of anything you are necessarily saying, what I am saying is that you are even still leaning into the lie that there isn't enough decent work to gone around for all of us.

You need to get that out of your head, fundamentally, before we can begin to envision a humane path forward for tech work in the US, either for immigrants or people born and raised in the US.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Last part of the last paragraph, we agree.

We need wage increases across the board, not importing new workers to fill roles at lower wages because we have plenty of workers that only need higher wages to fill those vacant roles.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You aren't understanding me, you keep trying to debate from the axiom that this is a zero sum game.

In otherwords when I say

"We need to increase wages and employment opportunities across the board for immigrants including tech worker immigrants"

You hear

"We need to hurt tech workers born and raised in the US who are already hurting.

My point of issue is that I did not say that, rather you are applying an axiom that those two MUST be inextricably linked and if there is even a remote chance we can improve the wages and general quality of life of tech workers born and raised in the US AND tech workers that want to immigrate to the US than the logic of applying that axiom becomes fundamentally questionable.

The US is the richest country on earth, or was... it is a lie the oligarchs and ruling class tell us that we cannot afford to pay US workers a living wage, tech workers or otherwise and it is a further lie that hopeful immigrants (tech workers or not) are a threat to the wellbeing of the US, far from it, immigrants are certainly the lifeblood of this country if there is anything still yet redeemable to it.

That is what you don't realize or refuse to realize.

This is NOT a zero sum game between tech workers who want to immigrate to the US and tech workers who were born and raised in the US.

The future is a shared solidarity not an increasing division, don't take my word for it, notice rather that large corporations favor this kind of atomization of workers into nationalisms, it makes the job of people oppressing workers in the US and abroad far easier when we take your perspective.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

us tech workers paid well though, just not the visa holders, thats why these tech companies are mostly hiring them now or in the future. my bros both earn 100k+, the older one earn 300k+ which is why they laid of the highest paying ones in 2023.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

Would it though?

If the requirement is "worth paying 50% more for than the average worker" then instead of picking someone worse for cheaper at random then you're making sure that only jobs where there likely isn't an adequate supply for due to how bell curves work,

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

biotech abuses the heck out of to, when i was searching like in the mid 2010s, yup you can guaranteed 1/4, would be asking for VISA help, if you need it. i feel like bio research is only kept alive because of the visas, or the current scientists they are holding onto, while refusing to hire more BS/MS holders so they can get into a proper career track and grad school.