They started out with something close to YAML. As the project moved forward, they found out they needed to represent logic with interlinked sections. They needed section 3, point a to link back to section 1 point 3, sub point 2. So they toyed with some assembly-like operations. Then they needed some inheritance. They really just slowly re-implemented the common applications of xml one at a time, it just had less brackets and <> symbols when they were done.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

it just had less brackets and <> symbols when they were done.

Hence making the parser more inefficient than XML?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It wasn't without some advantage. The client hating it didn't bode well though

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

The client hating it just means you're smarter than them and should press on to help them outgrow their ignorance. It's a good sign.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

YAML definitely felt less intimidating to me than XML, when I first saw them.
But the YAML examples also had much less information in them than the XML ones.
But not having to type all those brackets definitely helps. In case of XML, I am always looking to just get a GUI going for it instead, because typing it out feels cumbersome (I'm from C++)