this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
833 points (83.7% liked)
Political Memes
8951 readers
3195 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That would be accelerationism. The attached link might not completely match your views, but what you described aligns with it.
I was considering adopting this ideology during the presidential election and either voting for trump or not at all, but I decided against it. Adopting this view means you are discounting the sheer amount of human suffering that would be involved in the process because, "The ends justify the means."
Yes there is suffering right now, I am not discounting that. If you care about people, I would recommend taking the slow route of reform that will get us to a better place with enough time and effort.
You cannot deny that progress has been made over the last 100 years. It may not be much, but life is much better than it used to be for a lot of people. Not to say life is good, just to say we have been SLOWLY stepping forward.
https://pols.sites.haverford.edu/studentvoices/what-is-accelerationism/
I do subscribe to accelerationism.
The fact of the matter is that humans will suffer and die, no matter what you do.
Accelerating will kill and harm less people in the long run. It's a simple math equation of having more people suffer now for a shorter amount of time vs having people suffer and die until the end of time. Accelerationism will cause less suffering after a certain amount of time. It could be as a little as a decade of lasting capitalism causing the same amount of suffering and death as a accelerating the collapse of capitalism.
And yes progress has been made, but it is not a law of nature. We have also regressed again over the past century. Currently we're sliding back with the collapse of the Soviet Union and humanity failing to advance past capitalism. Technological progress will keep increasing quality of life to a point, but on a societal level we've been regressing since the 90s.
Saying reform will get us to a better place is a questionable argument. Historically reform has not achieved nearly as much as revolution. Reform let to Nazi dictatorship in Germany and in general the rise of fascism (as it might soon once again). Not a single time has socialism been established via reform. The one time it was attempted peacefully was in Chile. The response was a coup from an unpurged military and sympathisers in unpurged institutions with support from the CIA.
Meanwhile revolution dragged Russia from an unindustrialised backwater to a nation running one of the first space programs in the world within only 40 years. Likewise the French revolution led to the spread of liberalism and republicanism throughout the western world. It is the single most important reason why we live in the world we do today and not one of absolutism. Revolution is why the USA is an independent nation and not a colony anymore.
Do you think those would have been achieved with reform? If yes, do you think how much longer this would have taken and how many more would have continued suffering during this time would be worth it?
Both reform and "revolution" have their risks.
With reform, you are betting on a slow fight with less suffering and slow progress.
-Risk: Constant pressure from the right/ruling class will overwhelm any progress made.
With "revolution" you are wagering that a major amount of suffering will result in faster progress.
-Risk: Uncertainty. You cannot guarantee that the "good guys" will come out on top. And that is assuming America is operating in a vacuum. There are major superpowers who would absolutely love to take the land and resources we have. As well as others who would love to get a blow in for the suffering we have inflicted on them.
I am going to hold out hope for reform until USA's Zohran Mamdani Arc is over. If he is elected and able to reform NY, I will be staying on the reform side, since that will prove it is possible with enough time and effort.
Thank you for having this conversation and being willing to continue it.
I would caution you about your wording when discussing this in the future because phrasing mass suffering as, "a simple math equation" sounds horribly callous.