this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
95 points (98.0% liked)

Canada

10138 readers
751 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump-aligned congresspeople aren’t spreading wildfire disinformation in a vacuum; American social media giants are enabling a haze of conspiracy theories and misinformation about the wildfires ravaging Canadian forests, and are disguising the fossil fuel industry's role in the crisis, researchers have found.

Link above is to CAAD's (Climate Action Against Disinformation) - Briefing: Canadian Wildfire Disinformation June 2025

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaRocks@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago (8 children)

"The posts promoted numerous conspiracy theories — asserting the fires were primarily caused by arson..."

Well, according to our own government, more than 2/3 of wildfires ARE started by humans, but not necessarily arson. We are a sloppy lot, and untended campfires, thrown cigarette butts, even sparks from train wheels, and downed power lines are all culprits. But it IS mostly humans, not mother nature doing the most damage.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

And why is it so dry that these fires rage completely out of control?

[–] CanadaRocks@piefed.ca -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Yes its a couple of degrees warmer than it used to be. But that's hardly the major story. The fact is that we dont do much active fire management in Canada and we're way behind the curve.

Its a little known fact that fire is GOOD for promoting regrowth and rejuvenation in forests. In fact there are some species of trees that actually dont open their seeds until they are touched by fire. Lodgepole pine, Jack Pine, and Pitch Pine are notable examples that have serotinous cones sealed with resin, which melts and opens only when exposed to the heat of a fire. Who knew?

And who knew that indigenous peoples used to regularly start forest fires to rejuvenate the land, cleaning out all the old underbrush and deadfall and making the forest safe for years to come? But along came us settlers and we thought its better to just leave the forest alone. Wrong.

We actually had a wildfire come within 30 feet of our house two years ago. The efforts of a dedicated group of firefighters saved it, but three of my neighbors lost theirs. The forest looked terrible for a few months. But by the next summer it was already very green and THIS summer it looks amazing. There are already 5 foot tall trees where there was only black ground two years ago. The grass and trees look amazingly green and lush. And there is NO underbrush so the chances of another fire are pretty much zero for at least another 20 years.

IF the gov had an active forest management plan, with controlled forest burns, after carefully creating fire breaks around nearby populated areas, we wouldn't have wildly out of control fires every year that threaten people's homes and make the air hard to breathe.

Its not all about "climate change", MOST of the problem is poor management. And careless people.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's science we explain to literal 5 year olds. That's been saying it would happen like this since the 1970's you absolute ignoramus.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If it's not about "climate change" and it's about poor management then I guess we got worse at managing it proportional to the accumulation of GHGs in the atmosphere. What a coincidence.

You're talking about a possible mitigation strategy as if the lack of extra mitigation is the root cause. Token acknowledgments of "climate change" and "yeah it's a bit warmer" are thin veils on your denialism

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I thought agreed to stop making humans this stupid. How did you get past quality control?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)