When I tried it in the past, I kinda didn't take it seriously because everything was confined to its instance, but now, there's full-featured global search and proper federation everywhere? Wow, I thought I heard there were some technical obstacles making it very unlikely, but now it's just there and works great! I asked ChatGPT and it says this feature was added 5 years ago! Really? I'm not sure how I didn't notice this sooner. Was it really there for so long? With flairs showing original instance where video comes from and everything?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com 52 points 1 day ago (27 children)

I have to say I think Peertube itself is good, but the content still isn't there yet. Of course we all know that's because there isn't cash to be made on Peertube

[–] chromodynamic@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Got me thinking about how YouTubers get money. According to a quick web search, YT pays $0.01 to $0.03 per view. So if you release 10 videos a month, you made $0.10 per viewer. But Patreon memberships are typically around $5.00 a month, equivalent to $0.50 per view in the same scenario. Of course Patreon will take a cut, but it is still a lot more money.

So, if a lot of your viewers think your channel is good enough to donate to, ad money basically becomes an afterthought. In this case, the only advantage of YT over PT is discovery, i.e. the number of viewers likely to find your videos in the first place (but there's also more competition on YT, so...)

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Creators upload videos twice, once for patrons who watch them ad-free and once for people who don't want to pay. That way, people who don't have money to spend on YouTube can still enjoy their videos and they get a little kickback. Youtubers don't need Peertube to release videos ad-free, so it doesn't really change much if Patreon is more than enough.

Furthermore, the inherent privacy issues with peer to peer video consumption (I can easily track what videos you've been watching by simply connecting to the swarm) and the huge hosting costs a moderate sized Youtuber would inflict make the premise rather silly.

I think Peertube is great for small channels and maybe for corporate videos within an intranet, but Peertube can't afford a moderately popular Youtuber.

[–] chromodynamic@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Some good points I hadn't considered!

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (24 replies)