this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
374 points (96.5% liked)

Greentext

6731 readers
1479 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

No their games lack innovation. The games are essentially the same as they were 3 decades ago but with better graphics.

[–] jeff@programming.dev 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, what a wild take.

Nintendo might not be as innovative as some indie games but they constantly innovate and define new genres.

I mean, look at the consoles. Wii, Wii U, and Switch are all crazy innovative.

Some of their more innovative stuff might not be as popular, e.g., ARMS and LABO. Even their mainline series have some innovative mechanics for the genre.

Serious question. What company is more innovative than Nintendo?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I was referring more to their games. They haven’t defined a genre in over 25 years. I’m not saying they don’t make decent games. I’m saying the games are lack luster and more of the same of their decades old catalog.

Again not saying they don’t do some cool things from time to time but they do more turds than golden eggs.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

That is a wild take.