Mildly Interesting

21691 readers

1027 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

861

Today, the Mexican Government introduced its new chocolate bar, priced at less than $1USD. Made of 50% cocoa, powdered milk, vanilla. No refined sugar, no artificial flavourings. (files.catbox.moe)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

189 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Seems a little off topic and unsourced

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If someone justify a genocide how can you him in anything?

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I think the issue is that you've not provided evidence that the other user supports Israel's genocide in Gaza.

At the end of the day it's just an internet argument and not worth it, but if you want to make your point, I'd start by getting that evidence.

I do agree in principle that I would think twice before agreeing with any position a genocide supporter takes, though that doesn't necessarily mean I will disagree on any particular point after giving it due thought. If they said throwing puppies from a roof was bad, I'd agree, for example.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago

By whether they're making verifiable and objective claims? They aren't, really, and they certainly didn't source theirs, but it's a lot more convincing to say that instead of making your own unsourced accusations.