this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
672 points (99.9% liked)

PC Gaming

11706 readers
1174 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alexc@lemmy.world 34 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This is because we feel we paid for something that expects nothing in return.

When you pay for a game that includes add ons and microtransactions, all of a sudden we‘re back to being a marketing target, and we implicitly know we‘re pushed to spend money.

We play games to escape the real world…

[–] Flipper@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I think it is okay to have a dlc IF it is fairly priced, there is proper content included and the base wasn't gutted for it.

Positiv example would be Factorio. Negative example is Stellaris.

[–] Seefoo@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like owlcat has done a good job with this in their games. They feel complete and if you like the game there are DLCs with decent amounts of extra content. Also really like that the DLCs are integrated into the game (usually) and not just an extra chunk tacked on

[–] Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 minutes ago

Agreed, Owlcat has always earned my money and then some, I think. Especially with the new rogue trader DLCs, which are all connected to the main story somehow and playable in a new playthrough.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

I feel like RimWorld has also done well with this

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago

I've been wanting to spend more money towards the development of Factorio. I've played around 1500 hours before the DLC and they have very limited merch. While I am usually sceptical towards DLC in general, it was a no-brainer in this case.

They should sell some more merch though.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Tend to agree about DLC - Some times the Devs have too many ideas - DLC is way to manage costs. But only if it expands the game

[–] TheWriterAleph@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 hours ago

More than that. When you buy a game with microtransactions in it, you're volunteering to be a marketing target and paying for the privilege. Publishers aren't trying to get everyone to buy mtx, only the people who bought the game. You're giving them money and saying, "yes, I want to be targeted, please."