this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
115 points (89.7% liked)

People Twitter

7654 readers
801 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There's literally a section in the documentary where his doc is like 'You're getting liver damage from this diet. I don't believe it. I've only ever seen this from alcoholics.'

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It wasn't a study. It was a stunt. The stunt worked. People ate less fast food, and laws were passed restricting the companies ability to market to children.

[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago

Not to mention that McD's discontinued the Super Size option.

[–] Stamets@piefed.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm not saying it was a study, I'm saying people refer to it as one or treat it as one with alarming regularity.

Some people are stupid and they will believe anything that they see on TV. With how this documentary was framed as well, a lot of people just went about their lives assuming it was something that was reviewed and unflawed. There is a reason it was such a big deal when it came out he was an alcoholic during filming. About half of the documentary becomes completely worthless because we now know he was seriously lying during filming about what he was consuming. Which suddenly calls the entire thing into question because if he's willing to slide on something as major as that, then what is the value of the rest of it?