this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
511 points (98.5% liked)
Mildly Interesting
21612 readers
630 users here now
This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.
This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?
Just post some stuff and don't spam.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pretty sure its about creating negative suction below the fan. Instead of just pulling air from the intake side of the fan, its pulling it from all 4 directions. Theoretically the air flow going through the filter would be at least 4x but probably more in practice.
Well the rate of airflow through the fan is at its maximum when there are no filters attached to it. Each filter likely slows down airflow if hooked up in a "series" pattern, but you're right that having these four in "parallel" will increase flow compared to one strapped directly to it. I'm sure there's a problem with reducing the airflow too much, because the fans motor would start to burn, and I'd guess that hoisting the fan up in the air rather than standing upright on the ground would improve airflow.
That being said, I'd need to do it myself and see what strapping a single filter to a fan does. I have hunch it wouldn't burn out the motor, and I imagine it'd still be effective. If the rate of airflow isn't severely reduced with a single filter, that'd just mean the same amount of air is being forced through a filter in either case (1 vs 4 filters).
Of course the single filter would wear out four times as fast so it probably won't make a difference in how many you buy in the long run. I'm just sort of rambling at this point but it's a neat concept to think about.