this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Science Memes

15649 readers
224 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 0 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Why is AI reviewing papers to begin with is what I don't understand but I also don't understand an awful lot of things

[–] kewko@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 hours ago

perhaps you should ask AI to explain some things you don't understand

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It makes more sense when you consider that reviewing papers is expected but not remunerated, while scientific newspapers charge readers an extortionate fee.

[–] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Faculty are paid for doing peer review just like we're paid for publishing. We're not paid directly for each of either, but both publishing (research) and peer review (service to the field) are stipulated within our contracts. Arxiv is also free to upload to and isn't a journal with publication fees.

[–] fristislurper@feddit.nl 0 points 2 hours ago

But no-one is hiring professord because they are good at peer reviewing. Spending time on research is simply a 'better' use of your time.