I'm not the one who made their whole identity about conservatism. Normally that'd be fine, don't get me wrong, but you seem to see yourself as superior to everyone else here for that very reason.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He was a socialist before the election!

[–] DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Not sure what you mean. This post is a science article that has nothing to do with any election. It's a science community. The article had zero to do with politics.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mooooooo

[–] DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today -1 points 3 months ago

ok?

[–] DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m not the one who made their whole identity about conservatism.

Nor have I. I'm just posting non-political science articles to a non-political science community. I don't look at someone's post history, profile or poltics before I decide to downvote them.

Someone asked why the downvotes and I gave my theory that it was based on politics and not science or sources.

You seemed to imply that you disagreed with my take, yet your comments keep referring to the very politics that I stated in my original reasoning.

you seem to see yourself as superior to everyone else here for that very reason.

I have never said anything like that, nor do I feel that way. What have I said in this community that in any way, shape, or form implies that I see myself as "superior" to anyone?! In fact, I've mentioned that I don't care about downvotes or upvotes--I was merely responding to someones question under an article I posted.

I'm just a guy posting links to science articles appropriate for a science community.