Mildly Interesting

Ah. I missed the fine print part that says the actual data is from census polls, rather than what is actually likely. When you said "that doesn't mean all those people identify that way", I was like BUT THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT. That does change my impression of the graph significantly, because that would not necessarily mean the numbers are "actual", but rather, should read "actual poll data".

Most of the graph I feel is about right, too. I just find it hard to believe a lot of the upper half of the stuff is so wildly wrongly estimated AND that non-hertero sexualities is still portrayed as basically legacy data, rather than trying to forecast what we all know would be if people weren't repressed by society. Again, though, it's this way to fit a narrative, thus my minor issue.