this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
Science Memes
15710 readers
238 users here now
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
- !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !arachnology@mander.xyz
- !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !biology@mander.xyz
- !biophysics@mander.xyz
- !botany@mander.xyz
- !ecology@mander.xyz
- !entomology@mander.xyz
- !fermentation@mander.xyz
- !herpetology@mander.xyz
- !houseplants@mander.xyz
- !medicine@mander.xyz
- !microscopy@mander.xyz
- !mycology@mander.xyz
- !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
- !nutrition@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
- !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
- !plantid@mander.xyz
- !plants@mander.xyz
- !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz
Physical Sciences
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !chemistry@mander.xyz
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !geography@mander.xyz
- !geospatial@mander.xyz
- !nuclear@mander.xyz
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
- !spectroscopy@mander.xyz
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
- !gardening@mander.xyz
- !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
- !soilscience@slrpnk.net
- !terrariums@mander.xyz
- !timelapse@mander.xyz
Memes
Miscellaneous
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I dunno. I just read multiple papers from years to decades ago on the mechanical factors for popcorn because I kept burning kettle corn.
Who knows who will crack open the book someday and why. You either want to contribute or not. Don't focus on the perceived impact. It feels like modern culture has made any effort to try new things not seem worth it unless you get recognition but that's not why we did it originally.
I agree.. I feel this way often especially now when an ai can write, make music and movies, and no one can actually tell the difference, there isn't much point to creating anymore. Unless it's solely for you and you don't want to show it to anyone else.
I think you're missing the point here. This is about research being locked behind a paywall that causes it to not be used.
Yeah. But that doesn't mean it will never be used. It's normal to want to be paid for the work done but if people want to share they can just share it.
I think it's hard to say when someone will want your information and it might be well after you are dead and able to get anything from it.
There are lots of free recipes I would never use, and there are lots of paid cookbooks that I haven't gotten my hands on yet but might one day because of their knowledge of making a good roux is worth saving (bake it, not in a pot)
HA, get a load of this, everyone! This person thinks researchers get paid royalties by the publishers!
<the entirety of academia grimly chuckles, a single tear of inner pain welling in each eye>
Generally the difference is a paid service is better and worked on by the author. The work in these thesis 'services' is done by others, the research funded by our tax dollars, and the 'service' doesn't contribute much of anything to be paid beyond server storage.
Researchers dont get paid. In fact, they usually have to pay to be published on reputable platforms. Those platforms are the ones charging.
As for why they publish there if they never profit, academic success is dependant on publishing ("published or perish"), so academics will pay to advance in their field, potentially getting funding for future studies. (Not from the publisher, obviously; but from grant programmes that only fund you if you have a body of work already.)
This is why if you contact a researcher directly, they'll likely be willing to give you the finished thesis for free.
Huh it's funny how I think to do research for some things but not others. I really enjoy making popcorn on the stove but only half the time does it turn out light and crunchy. I keep at it thinking I'll figure it out through trial and error but I should probably just look it up like you did.
Oh I am a scientist for everything I do. Make my hypothesis of and test stuff for how I think it would work but also so many people have done it already.
It's essentially what all recipes are. Someone else did the research and I am taking their effort for an easier time. The best ones even note what changes to make for slight differences.
Also higher heat than you think, 400°F/200°C oil works best but you can also go dry and you will get a more puffed size apparently. To much moisture when cooking makes them dense.
I have discovered a wok is a really great popcorn maker if you don't want to buy something niche. The high dome lid is double perfect for it and then shaking in the salt.
Ah my most recent assumptions seem to be wrong then. I thought I was unevenly heating the kernels and that's why they weren't popping fully, but maybe I'm not heating them fast enough actually.
Gonna try the wok thing, I've been looking for one more excuse to get one.