this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
198 points (88.7% liked)

politics

24617 readers
2634 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AntOnARant@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why all the hate for Biden? It’s trump and the republicans that have created this situation, isn’t it?

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Biden had so many chances to change the path we are on today. And he squandered every single one of them.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 12 points 23 hours ago

This. At the very least, he could have expanded the SC to 13 and named a bunch of new judges. But nah.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He's an old fart that does things by the book and does them well with mostly good intentions from an outside perspective. He worked within those confines and got shit done in an adversarial environment. He didn't anticipate the fuck-the-book approach that is now allowing trump to flagrantly ignore the constitution.

Had he known he may have reoriented his strategies. But that's hindsight right? Also fuck him for preventing an actual primary and forcing Kamala on the ticket - that was a known bad approach even without hindsight.

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

He ignored plenty of "by the book" ways to avoid our current situation. And he didn't anticipate the approach that Trump had used for the 4 years prior to his presidency? That just proves he's a terrible president.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 23 hours ago

He didn’t anticipate the fuck-the-book approach that is now allowing trump to flagrantly ignore the constitution

Trump was perfectly transparent about his intentions. If Biden didn't anticipate this he's incompetent and deserves every ounce of hate coming his way.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Trump did it the first time. Why would any person with common sense not believe he would do that again?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, because we had clear expectations for Biden when he was elected.

Close the inhumane border camps.

Deal with Covid.

Prosecute trump and his collaborators litany of crimes.

In the end, he went 0/3 on those. His legacy is one of shirked responsibility.

[–] Ruxias@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't "nothing will fundamentally change" what he said to the donors at a private event? Mission accomplished I guess....

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

No idea, I don't really give a fuck about a small quote without context said behind closed doors. I care about what issues were facing the nation, and what was done to solve them.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reminds me of an adage:

It takes two to lie: one to lie, and one to listen

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's a bad adage; I wouldn't claim that as a true thing most people believe.