209
Source: OAG Data
Interesting that California's was higher than Florida/Texas until 2007 and 2015.
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
209 points (99.1% liked)
Mildly Interesting
21676 readers
98 users here now
This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.
This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?
Just post some stuff and don't spam.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Some thoughts:
Florida had a striking increase between 2003 and 2008 that isn’t reflected by California or Texas. Did something specific happen in Florida in that timeframe?
Texas seems to have been on a long-term downward trend until 2013 (while Florida was spiking). The subsequent upward trend is mirrored by Florida, but not California.
What does “age-adjusted” mean?
Does “per 100,000” refer to the entire population, or the population under 25? If the former, could some of the differences be accounted for by changing demographics?
That’s what age-adjustment prevents.
So if I understand that right, the “per 100,000” figures aren’t for the exact populations, but for what the populations would be if the age groups were re-weighted to keep the age demographics constant?
Right, it imposes the collected data on a chosen model population. I wish it told you what that population was, but I don’t see it.
2005 would have been when Stand Your Ground was implemented, other than that I'm not sure — could be related to the housing crisis as well.