this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
1170 points (96.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7138 readers
1840 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The libs are the ones paying the medicaid tax, and who make to much to qualify to use it. The rich don't pay it on the majority of their income. So what we have here is the cost of socialism but none of the benefits on the middle class libs. The rich get sweet crony capitalism paid for by the middle class libs. The elderly happily use medicare + part B, paid for by the middle class libs, and then vote republican. Socialism's benefits with none of it's costs.

I would say republicans have been owning the libs for quite some time. The libs are tapped out though.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I’m happy to pay for that though. Obviously the rich need to pay more or be eaten. But I’m ok with my part in things.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I was ok with it until they started stripping rights from minority groups. I'm personally done subsidizing people who want me and my family destroyed.

Now is the time to look out for me and mine, and I will not vote for any candidate unless they will advocate for the socialist contract for EVERYONE, and package that with putting into law the rights important to me and my family. Either the US becomes a petro-techno-oligarchy or it gets fixed. In the former, I look out for me and don't subsidize people who try to take my rights away, and in the latter we all keep our beliefs from infringing on others and pay our share towards a greater good. I'm not waiting around footing the bill any longer though.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

I agree with your sentiment 100%. In principle, though, I don’t think it’s okay to categorize and lump people together based on income bracket, assign them a political ideology because of it, and then discriminate against them on that basis.

In practice, however, at this stage of the game, I’m not sure you’re wrong.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

Boomers are the most selfish generation of all time, it was bound to happen as they aged.