this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
1508 points (97.6% liked)

Political Memes

8739 readers
3228 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm doubtful that an armed US populace will be effective against the militarized police forces and literal military being deployed against Citizens.

The second amendment was more realistic when society had roughly the same fire power as the military, but not so much any more.

They have predator drones, we have AR-15's. These are not the same.

[–] dropped_packet@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I find this sentiment very funny, considering the United States terrible performance in asymmetrical warfare.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think we won a war against an insurgency on their own soil in….. ever?

And that’s with the benefits of untouchable supply lines, and war production, unparalleled intelligence apparatus, and the ability to print money.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Exactly. Proving you ultimately can't control an armed populace who are willing to take up arms against you.

This all falls apart when most of the country is mass surveilled and production is automated. If only 10% of the workforce are required, it's easier to control the 10% you need by killing the other 90%, ever shrinking the population of proles until only the < 1% remain.

That's why fascism, billionaires, and all oligarchs must be eliminated before general AI and mass automation are realized, otherwise the 99% face genocide.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

Did they have predator drones in Afghanistan?

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

The number of Americans who showed up to protest in the streets on No King's Day was at least 1 million more than the sum total of US military and police members.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I always find it funny when people put hope in 2a.

Sure there's military personal that traffick weapons to the streets, cartel and Mafias... But citizens are going to need tanks, battleships, and airplanes. I want to see air craft carriers floating down the Mississippi.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Start with small groups of ICE agents?
Weapons manufacturing facilities?
Infrastructure? Hacktivism?
Economic targets?
Rich mansions?

Anything's better than shoulder-shrugging after decades of molon labe.