this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1207 points (98.5% liked)

Bluesky

1377 readers
1729 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] justineie_bobeanie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This rhetoric adds nothing of subtance to the political understanding of either contemporary Trumpism or the history of Stalinism. Sanders only serves to obscure the meaning of this critically important understanding. Fascism and Stalinism are not the same.

To be clear, Stalinism took hold in the Soviet Union as a result of its historic backwardness and international isolation. The failure of the revolution to take root in Europe (largely a result of the historic betrayal of Social Democracy in the Second International) created conditions for the consolidation of a nationalist clique and a bureaucratic degeneration of the workers state that formed from the victory of the October Revolution. That is Stalinism. This political form was responsible for mass murder of the old cadres of the revolution who opposed it, systematic betrayal of the workers movement internationally, collaboration with imperialism allowing for the restabilization of capitalism during its repeated periods of crisis, and ultimately the destruction of Soviet Union union and the restoration of capitalism in 1991. A detailed and correct historical understanding of this history is critically important for the working class as it enters into a new period of revolutionary struggle.

Sanders use of the term as a political slur wrongly directed at Trump confuses the issue, and ultimately gives capitalism a pass for its own crisis. Trump is not simply an evil individual responsible for wrecking America. He is the product of the terminal crisis of capitalism at the center of world imperialism. He represents a financial oligarchy whose wealth and influence has grown increasingly disconnected from social development and the process of production. The historic content of Trumpism has a stronger relationship to the fascism of Mussolini and Hitler than the national labor bureaucraticism of Stalin.

This is no small error by Sanders. This is a deliberate falsification that is calculated to confuse political consciousness and hinder the development of revolutionary conclusions. It should be clear to anyone who takes more than a second to think about it that the comparison to Stalinism is shallow. The historic content of Trumpism is its own.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Fascism and Stalinism are not the same.

People who unironically support Stalinism in the modern day are red fascists. Whether they are technically the exact same thing or not isn't a meaningful discussion considering the commentary that Sanders is offering here. He is specifically operating within the context of modern American politics. Something average academic/armchair/larpy leftists are often completely fucking incapable of. His main use of analogizing Stalinism with Trumpism is the Cult of Personality not that they are literally the exact same thing. It is exhausting that this needs to be explained.

Sanders use of the term as a political slur wrongly directed at Trump confuses the issue, and ultimately gives capitalism a pass for its own crisis.

How does it give a pass to capitalism? Sanders himself would agree that capitalism contributed to Trumpism.

This is a deliberate falsification that is calculated to confuse political consciousness and hinder the development of revolutionary conclusions.

This is a level of paranoia suggesting actual brain damage, seek medical attention.

[–] justineie_bobeanie@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is a level of paranoia suggesting actual brain damage, seek medical attention.

I think you underestimate the class consciousness of the ruling class. Bernie has been faithfully playing his assigned role to keep increasingly radicalized sections of the working class and youth within the orbit of the Democratic Party. I do not think it is a stretch to assign consciously anti-revolutionary motives to his statements, especially this stupidly anti-communist statement.

Despite my therapist not agreeing with me on politics, she thinks I am mentally fine.

How does it give a pass to capitalism? Sanders himself would agree that capitalism contributed to Trumpism.

Stalinism was a degeneration of the workers state in the Soviet Union. Fascism is an extreme counterrevolutionary form of capitalism. Assigning one (Stalinism) to the other (Trump/MAGA) is a category error. Ahisotorical and unscientific (and likelh a conscious distortion given Sanders political history and experience).

People who unironically support Stalinism in the modern day are red fascists.

The Stalinist perspective is counterrevolutionary, but it is not fascist. Ironically, most actual Stalinists will have disavowed Stalin by now following his death and Krushev's secret speech. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the restoration of capitalism, international Stalinists are largely reduced to trade union organizing and activist pressure groups. In the third world they routinely enter into coalitions with bourgeois nationalist governments. Edgy teenagers on the internet are not serious Stalinists.

He is specifically operating within the context of modern American politics. Something average academic/armchair/larpy leftists are often completely fucking incapable of. His main use of analogizing Stalinism with Trumpism is the Cult of Personality not that they are literally the exact same thing.

In the contact of American politics, the role of anticommunism cannot be overstated. Sanders plays into this tradition because he supports it. He could have criticized Trump's cult of personality by referencing the fascist Mussolini (or just made it a direct statement about Trump). He chose to use the word "Stalinism" despite it being clearly inappropriate because it serves his political function.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Bernie has been faithfully playing his assigned role to keep increasingly radicalized sections of the working class and youth within the orbit of the Democratic Party.

No. This is a delusional take.

Despite my therapist not agreeing with me on politics, she thinks I am mentally fine.

She's wrong if you genuinely think the Sanders is a pro-capitalist plant. Either that or you don't actually believe this and you are arguing in bad faith because you actually simply dislike Sander's openly stated politics.

Or you have not actually paid any consistent attention to Sanders at all or read up on his history before he became politically relevant.

Stalinism was a degeneration of the workers state in the Soviet Union. Fascism is an extreme counterrevolutionary form of capitalism. Assigning one (Stalinism) to the other (Trump/MAGA) is a category error. Ahisotorical and unscientific

Even if you are technically correct, none of this matters in the current political context. You are being nitpicky at best, but more likely just engaging in irrelevant intellectual masturbation/showboating. Further, this doesn't actually explain why Sanders gives a pass to capitalism, you are just repeating the same point. Being anti-Stalinism and being open about that doesn't make you apologetic to capitalism unless you take a very "You are with us or against us" campist perspective.

(and likelh a conscious distortion given Sanders political history and experience).

Instead of ignoring now, you are misrepresenting the context of his statement. The left in the US is currently on the backfoot. (Even with a specific notable newsworthy exception in NYC) Sanders knows that liberals and conservatives alike in the US associate Stalin vaguely with very bad things and is using that cultural association. Now, do I think this is politically effective? IDK. I suspect the problem with Sanders is generally that he is not mean enough to his opposition, and this is indeed tactical but not for reasons you are laying out. Given his history the idea that hes secretly a pro-capitalism plant is actually completely flabbergastingly stupid. Like I can't take you seriously for saying that and I only continue this conversation due to curiosity.

Ironically, most actual Stalinists will have disavowed Stalin by now following his death and Krushev’s secret speech. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the restoration of capitalism, international Stalinists are largely reduced to trade union organizing and activist pressure groups. In the third world they routinely enter into coalitions with bourgeois nationalist governments. Edgy teenagers on the internet are not serious Stalinists.

OK, then it sounds like they're red fascists to me. They are fascists who just want to not be associated with fascism.

Sanders plays into this tradition because he supports it (anti-communism).

No he doesn't. He might not support authoritarianism but he's not an anti-communist. A lazy example: he has defended Castro before.

He could have criticized Trump’s cult of personality by referencing the fascist Mussolini (or just made it a direct statement about Trump).

He's compared him to Mussolini already. In 2020, "We have a president now who is a pathological liar. We have a president who is trying to undermine democracy. We have a president who admires authoritarian figures. I mean, it's not an exaggeration to compare him to Mussolini." Hes going to compare him to any historical figure views as authoritarian, because Sanders is anti-authoritarian.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One is fascism, the other is red fascism. Different ideologies but same cheeks from the same arse as one might put it.

[–] justineie_bobeanie@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I reject this analysis as unscientific and ahistoric. The similarities are entirely superficial. Its not a matter of different ideology, but different historic content of the regimes themselves.

You may reject, but the empirical basis is there. Different cheeks from the same authoritarian arse.