this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
-28 points (15.0% liked)
Progressive Politics
2912 readers
198 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I support a month for both men's mental health and LGBTQ pride, but the positioning of both is a bit hamfisted and could be read into maliciously.
Fact is though, if we do not support men in some way, the alienation turns them into enemies. I would much prefer an ally to support, no?
am I talking to Neville Chamberlain here. We shouldn't appease fascist men. If men feel alienated by feminism or women's empowerment then you don't want them on yoru side anyways.
We tried compromising with them. Plenty of women still date and want relationships with men even though it has literally no benefit, they have tons of porn they can watch with the possibility of legalized prostitution already being talked about and if that isn't good enough they can just transition and be a woman which they won't because they know women are still oppressed and they hate women.
Their misogyny is why women don't want them and why women are saying no. Most men are just not worth it.
You’re equating men’s mental health with the three factors in your post.
Mental health is health. They aren’t separate. It’s absurd to propose that men’s health should be suppressed. Does that not insinuate that non-Nazi men have no (mental) health issues?