this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15741 readers
224 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (23 children)

So this is pretty neat:

https://www.science.org/content/article/born-run-early-endurance-running--may-have-evolved-help-humans-chase-down-prey

Humans aren't good at running fast, but we are good at running for a long time for long distances, so it's thought that we would just run after things until they got tired.

So like you know how people in horror movies would run and then look over their shoulder and Jason is somehow still there?

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Funny enough there is another animal I know that can sweat, have more endurance than humans, and much faster than humans. Horses.

Imagine you fear getting caught by a horse or a human and then suddenly a human riding a horse shows up.

[–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's pretty cool. However, no human has ever won by more than 15min, and every horse has a 15min delay built into their times. So even the biggest winning margin of nearly 11 minutes would have lost to the horse if they had started at the same time.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The horses also all had humans on their backs. To my knowledge, none of the humans had horses on their backs.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

For it to be scientifically accurate of a comparison, the ratio of weight:human needs to be equal to that of rider:horse, not a direct flip.

In case my phrasing is confusing, to illustrate what I mean here is an example: a 200lb horse carrying a 100lb human is equivalent to a 100lb human carrying a 50lb weight.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago

Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)