Not The Onion

17072 readers

861 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

Toronto-area school bus driver seen in vehicle with ‘Lolita’s Line’ sign in window removed from route (www.ctvnews.ca)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The parents are also heard taking issue with the fact that the bus driver appears to be dressed in a schoolgirl’s uniform. The bus driver is heard saying that they “do this every week.” “And I don’t think there’s any problem,” they are heard saying to the parents before driving away.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Every individual on this planet has the right to express themselves independently of how others around them might perceive them.

Yes, absolutely. We have the right to express ourselves. But we aren't entitled to employment in any position we want at any company we want regardless of how we express ourselves in public while representing that company. "Dressing in flashy attention-seeking outfits and displaying a sign that says Lolita" isn't a category that's protected from employment discrimination.

The dude isn't facing criminal charges. Just normal workplace consequences that anyone should have expected regardless of whether you feel it's right.

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yea gonna disagree there. A company shouldn't have the right to end employment over inconsequential differences. That is not their authority.

So long as the individual is doing the job, which is simply to drive a bus in this case, everything else is irrelevant and companies should go get fucked for trying to dictate that. How he dresses has nothing to do with his ability to drive a bus and shouldn't be allowed to be a factor in determining his employment.

The entire point is he shouldn't have had to face any consequences for something so benign.

[–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's not "inconsequential" if it causes friction with your client. You can say "this is fucking bullshit and fuck anyone who disagrees" as much as you want because you're an uninvolved keyboard warrior, but the employer has to be pragmatic.