this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
661 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71558 readers
4471 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpicyTaint@lemmy.world 109 points 21 hours ago (30 children)

I've started bulk downloading videos with yt-dlp and watching them locally. No ads or throttling to deal with.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 34 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (16 children)

If Google really wants to, they can crack down on yt-dlp, and I assume that if enough people are using it, they're likely to do such a crackdown. Like, this works for the moment, but...

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 18 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

Nah. How would you crack down a program that just play the videos in the background and then just capture the content while it's played?

Just queue up a bunch of vidoe you wanna watch, and let the program just essentially screen record it.

Well if you say "DRM"? Well we could share it to a display that itself is hacked and record all the signals.

Unless they are doing proctoring as if it were a test, there will always be some way to circumvent it.

[–] ChaosMonkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Hmm, but in this case you would be recording either the ads or the buffering.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I'm so used to the sponsorship thing that I just instinctively tap/click the right side of the screen a few times to skip it.

(As for why I don't use sponsorblock: I don't block them because I wanna take a few seconds to take a peak into the sponsor segment to make sure they don't have very evil sponsors like ahem "Betterhelp" (I don't trust someone that still have that as a sponsor in 2025)

Edit: Also, I'm pretry sure someone will build a locally run AI model that can detect the ads/buffering and cut it out. "AI" might not give you true information in terms of search results, but pattern recognition is like its main job, right?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Imagine adblock re-rencoding software that picks mp4s clean based on repeated content(ads). The user could select each ad as they happen, mark them as such and let it identify them from there. Imagine sharable or federated caches of these ad records between users.

Someone who can code, please, imagine it.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

What they should be imagining instead is a better video sharing platform. There are alternatives already...

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Cause all you need is your imagination!

And billions of dollars to build and run the site with servers worldwide. No biggie

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)