this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
361 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24180 readers
3304 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It is legit crazy that this guy was hired as a consultant by a liberal governor of a blue state.

Are you referring to this:

Walz reupped Boelter’s membership to a workforce development advisory board

Because if so, it seems you're grossly misrepresenting it.

It sounds like some rubber stamp bullshit a governor signs off on after his subordinates approve/disapprove candidates. I bet Walz had no idea who he was when he signed off.

Way different than, "hired as a consultant".

Sure, someone in his cabinet maybe fucked up by not checking this guy's social media to make sure he's not a fascist, but I doubt Walz himself had anything to do with it.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

It sounds like some rubber stamp bullshit a governor signs off on after his subordinates approve/disapprove candidates. I bet Walz had no idea who he was when he signed off.

I think this is absolutely correct. In fact, he was Boetler was originally appointed to the board by the prior Governor Mark Dayton. All Walz did was retain him in the same position he already held.

It appears it is the same Boelter who was appointed to the Governor’s Workforce Development Board in 2019 by Gov. Tim Walz. He appointed to the Governor’s Workforce Development Council in 2016 by then-Gov. Mark Dayton.”

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It sounds like some rubber stamp bullshit a governor signs off on after his subordinates approve/disapprove candidates.

Your primary job as governor is to vet the people you're bringing on board your administration. If you're just keeping around esoteric fascists because crypto-nazi Tim Pawlenty recommended him, you're not doing your job well enough.

Sure, someone in his cabinet maybe fucked up by not checking this guy’s social media to make sure he’s not a fascist

This guy's got more than a few foul Facebook posts to his name.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Your primary job as governor is to vet the people you’re bringing on board your administration.

That is far from the primary job of a state Governor. Do you really think that state Governors primarily sit around and personally read through everyone's social media posts?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Do you really think that state Governors primarily sit around and personally read through everyone’s social media posts?

For cabinet positions? They better be doing a damned site more than trolling Facebook. One of the more cringeworthy aspects of the current Trump cabinet is his habit of picking up people he recognizes from TV. And yes, this is arguably the most important decision an executive chief can make - Governor, President, Mayor, whatever.

Thankfully, this asshole wasn't in Walz's inner circle, or there really would have been a scandal. But each of his cabinet picks need to vet and hire their own deputies. And they need to hire their own circle. At some point in this chain of hiring, somebody just waved this psycho through. For a fuck up of that magnitude, Walz absolutely should be firing whomever was in charge of assembling that board. And he should be going back down the line to weed out anyone of similar history or disposition.

And again, this wasn't just some guy with sour Facebook material. This is like putting David Koresh on the government payroll.