Greentext

6494 readers

1041 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

495

Anon predicts the future (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 day ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You can enter the camera as evidence, and prove that it has been used for other footage. Each camera should have a unique key to be effective.

So if you create a new key, it won't match the one on am existing camera. If you steal the key, then once that's discovered, the camera should generate a new one.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But if you don't actually check the physical camera and prove that key for yourself, then it can easily be faked by generating a key that is not coming from the camera and is used for the "proof" video and the fake video.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Any self-respecting judge would check, and hopefully most journalists would keep records of these things to prove where the footage came from.