this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16700 readers
239 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Like at the end of the day it’s just humans developing a system to make sense of nature

The core of the matter is that we have multiple, mutually incompatible schemes sharing in part the same terminology. Biology is not cooking, both fields care about vastly different things thus the categorisation scheme is different, that's the end of it. Culinarily, tomatoes have too much umami to be fruit. Botanically peppermint is an aromatic, I recommend you not put any into your soffritto.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Botanically" "culinary" "terminology" "biology" and then you say umami seriously. Which is entirely made up.

Oh, this is actually a perfect example of the arbitreity of mapping systems!

A looong time ago on reddit, I got into an argument with someone who was doing that thing where you confuse the map for the object itself. We were mostly talking about the chemistry table. But anyway, he just could not see how a change in motivation, that is what the map designer finds useful, could change how the map is arranged.

I mean, I don't think this would convince him: he would just say the culinary version isn't real. But still, I really like it.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You never had tomato pie? It would likely change your idea of what too much savoriness is.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I haven't but that sounds like a pie not a cake. A meal, not a dessert.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, not all pies are desserts for sure, but a tomato pie is, unless you deviate from the usual recipes.

Besides, you didn't say that a dessert has to be a cake.

There's also tomato jams, compote, and you can do a tomato cake mind you, a tomato cake is really more like banana bread, where it's a flavoring more than the star of the show.

Point is that tomatoes can definitely serve in the same role as "fruit", just like some things that are sweeter can be used in savory dishes.

It's about the preparation, not the ingredient. I mean, look at bacon jam. Not a dessert, but it's a savory and sweet spread that's used in the same was as fruit based jams. Onion jam is in the same range (and, as a side note, there's also onion and tomato pie which is more of a savory dish than a dessert, despite being fairly sweet anyway).

From a culinary standpoint, there are few ingredients that are fully excluded from dessert territory by virtue of having strong savory taste. There's also not many excluded from entrees purely because they're sweet. It's all a wonderful spectrum of sweet and savory

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I want my bananas to be the star of the bread show.
But to be fair, I am a horny slut for bananas.

I should look up some tomato stuff; I've never even heard of these things.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Banana bread may be the best baked good in human history.

[–] stray@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago

I think it should be possible to break the culinary categorisation down to chemistry. That doesn't tell you anything about the "why" but it's definitely not random and definitely not all in our heads.

I agree with what you mean in kind of a broad-strokes way, but as individuals our subjective experiences of flavors can vary pretty wildly. There's genetics, neurology, age, and habit/experience that influence our taste in terms of actually sensing the chemicals. Then there's what we see, taste, and smell just prior or during tasting that severely impact our interpretation of that chemical sense.