this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
504 points (96.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

35142 readers
666 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I found this thought funny. A few years ago everyone was all learn to code so you don't lose your job! Now there wont be any programming jobs in 10 years. But we will need a lot of manual labor still.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We are still a long ways away from AI being able to replace programmers. The amount of sheer bullshit code and wrong stuff it writes currently will cripple any information system currently keeping economies up and running.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That won't stop large corporations from dramatically reducing programming jobs my friend.

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Until they notice that cleaning up after failed AI-written code is more expensive than writing working code from the start. Which is already happening for some companies.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Which is already happening for some companies.

Yes. We're just getting there. Three years ago, there wasn't much hiring of junior developers, and it takes about three years for a junior to grow into a senior.

It also takes 3-5 years for stupid code choices to hurt in ways that affect a businesses bottom line.

These two factors should boil over each-other nicely in the near future.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I watched in real time tech bros defending AI about stealing everyone's art to them realizing that they're creating something that will replace them. It was sad funny.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago

They will be forced to replace the laid off workers when they see that AI doesn’t replace them. Having a skill will still be valuable. Search “Klarna AI rehire”. That’s just support agents. Coders will be fine.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Sounds like a lot of opportunities opening up for smaller independent companies.

I think a lot of the crunch in the labor market for programmers is "monkey see monkey do" thinking at the big tech companies. It might even be somewhat calculated, though I hesitate to call something a conspiracy when it could simply be due to stupidity on the part of senior management.

Large tech companies tend to have a lot of flexibility and their total headcount because they have a wide variety of departments and tasks that they can set aside for an extended period before it causes any problems. Those problems will eventually catch up with them, though, as will a code base written by somebody who doesn't understand what they're trying to accomplish.

So I think the pendulum is going to swing back to a labor crunch at some point. My guess is at least another 6 months before we see any hint of that, though. I don't think it will be as bad as it was before the advent of LLMs, though. They really are a productivity enhancing tool, particularly for software developers who know what they're doing.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well yeah but I believe the idea is in short the uncertainty, why it's saying "in 10 years". Think of it now as you have a kid graduating high school this year, and asks you what to major in in college that's likely to make enough to pay off those killer loans it's going to take.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, Wordpress was meant to replace all professional web builders. Visual programming was meant to obsolete all programmers because everyone will be able to write software. Every decade there's a new thing that will replace programmers. Nothing did so far.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nothing did so far.

You have to admit, Visual Basic 3.0 was some cool shit, though, right?

I'll admit it didn't replace us, and it's gone now. But that shit was still cool.