this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
188 points (99.0% liked)

World News

47455 readers
2365 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The US is obligated by law, to keep sending them weapons in order to maintain a "qualitative military edge" against all potential threats. This unfortunately incentivizes Israel to maintain a high threat level, in order to increase the amount of weapons it receives.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

obligated by law, to keep sending them weapons

Can you expand on that?

There are agreements but to which extent are they binding? I guess they are not unconditional.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Given the interference in Ukraine's military aid that was also required by law passed by Congress, they are only as binding as the government's willingness to be bound. Congress can repeal it, and apparently the President can just ignore it because the points are made up and the rules don't matter.

[–] Airowird@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Welcome to Whose war is it anyway?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

This explains it in better detail than I could. It isn't so much a single law, but rather a lot of different laws that all work together to ensure that Israel is given everything it could possibly need for its own defense...even bypassing normal regulatory measures in the process, as long as certain conditions are maintained.

Israel has invested tens of millions of dollars lobbying for, and helping to write, the legislation that guarantees their continuous access to weapons. A lot of it is written directly into defense spending bills that are essential for domestic defense spending as well. So, without a massive shift in policy at the legislative level to disentangle those priorities, that support is legally binding.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

The US is obligated by law,

Yea, that's a law we passed, right? One which we could repeal, too?

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"By law". It's just a convenient excuse for genocidal immorality. It's not like words on paper matter to anyone in power in the West, you'd definitely be blind to think otherwise.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"The West" is a bit too broad don't you think.

I think that's blinkered, if not blind. Definitely.

And that username... (edit: oh look they just changed it from "ArgumentativeMonotheist" to "YappyMonotheist")

But being a horny mouse is a-okay?!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You had me in the first sentence; not gonna lie. The second one, though, just goes off the rails.