this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
344 points (91.7% liked)

Games

44055 readers
1419 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 8 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

Can someone help me to understand the difference between Generative AI and procedural generation (which isn't something that's relevant for Expedition 33, but I'm talking about in general).

Like, I tend to use the term "machine learning" for the legit stuff that has existed for years in various forms, and "AI" for the hype propelled slop machines. Most of the time, the distinction between these two terms is pretty clean, but this area seems to be a bit blurry.

I might be wrong, because I've only worked with machine learning in a biochemistry context, but it seems likely that modern procedural generation in games is probably going to use some amount of machine learning? In which case, would a developer need to declare usage of that? That feels to me like it's not what the spirit of the rule is calling for, but I'm not sure

[–] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

generative ai is a subset of procedural generation algorithms. specifically it's a procedural algorithm with a massive amount of weight parameters, on the order of hundreds of billions. you get the weights by training. for image generation (which i'm assuming is what was in use here), the term to look up is "latent diffusion". basically you take all your training images and blur them step by step, then set your weights to mimic the blur operation. then when you want an image you run the model backwards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You can use statistics to estimate a child's final height by their current height and their parents' height.

People "train" models by writing a program to randomly make and modify equations, then keep them depending on if new accuracy is higher.

Generative AI can predict what first result on google search or first reply on whatsapp will look like for llms.

There are problems. Training from 94% to 95% accuracy takes exponentially more resources as it doesn't have some "code" you can fix. Hallucinations will happen.

On the other side, procedural algorithms in games just refer to handwritten algorithms.

For example a programmer may go "well a maze is just multiple, smaller mazes combined." Then write a program to generate mazes based on that concept.

It's much cheaper, you don't need GPU or internet connection to use the algorithm. And if it doesn't work people can debug it on the spot.

Also it doesn't require stealing from 100 million people to be usable

(I kinda oversimplified generative AI, modern models may do something entirely different)

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

From my understanding, AI is the general field of automating logical ("intelligent") tasks.

Within it, you will find Machine Learning algorithms, the ones that are trained on exemplar data, but also other methods, for instance old text generators based on syntactic rules.

Within Machine Learning, not all methods use Neural Networks, for instance if you have seen cool brake calipers and rocket nozzle designed with AI, I believe those were made with genetic algorithms.

For procedural generation, I assume there is a whole range of methods that can be used:

  • Unreal Engine Megaplants seems to contain configurable tree generation algorithms, that's mostly handcrafted algorithms with maybe some machine learning to find the parameters ranges.
  • Motion capture and 3D reconstruction models can be used to build the assets. I don't believe these rely on stolen artist data.
  • Full on image generation models (sora, etc.) to produce assets and textures, these require training on stolen artist data AFAIK (some arrangements were made between some companies but I suspect it's marginal).
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kogasa@programming.dev 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The only takeaway is that the Indie Game Awards' rule is overly restrictive. Woops, one of your contracted artists used a GenAI model to generate a music playlist to set the mood while he was working on your game, you're disqualified and the fact that you didn't come forward with this information immediately makes you a liar. Obviously absurd. If they're going to take a strong anti-AI stance, it should be more realistic. At some point, maybe even already, every single competitor should be disqualified but isn't aware or forthcoming about it, so what's the rule actually doing except rewarding dishonesty?

[–] nostrauxendar@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

The GenAI asset was in the final release. It wasn't that a subcontractor used GenAI to create a music playlist to listen to while they worked. That's a very different thing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›