this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
119 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26757 readers
2891 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A potential deal to fund large swaths of the federal government, including the departments of Defense and Health and Human Services, collapsed Thursday night after Colorado senators demanded that Congress stop Trump’s efforts to dismantle a key climate agency.

A Democratic senator involved in the negotiations over passing a five-bill package of appropriations bills before Christmas said Trump’s attempt to break up a premier weather and climate center based in Boulder, Colo., was like a “stick of dynamite” that exploded any chance of a bipartisan breakthrough on spending.

Colorado Sens. Michael Bennet (D) and John Hickenlooper (D) objected to moving forward with the so-called minibus spending package that, if enacted into law, would result in 85 percent to 90 percent of the federal government being funding through September 2026.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 34 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Good! This will be PERFECT for a Few Days until the Democrats trade ALL LEVERAGE for a Promise to Maybe Not Possibly Sometimes CLOSE this Important Center!

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Dems had a decent strategy with the Healthcare subsidies. We are only under a continuing resolution and unfortunately the average American is fucking dumb. They cannot understand that something will happen. They only understand when something is happening to them personally.

So the last shutdown was giving dems a bad look because the subsidies hadn't been canceled yet and people were too dumb to realize the impact.

Now dems have Republicans on record voting against the subsidies and can once again shutdown the government to force them to give in. With broader support from the people.

This is what I think they wanted to do, but they failed big time. They waited so long to sign a continuing resolution the party just looked weak by having caved with no real progress. Long term it still may play out but short term was rough

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lolz. How soon until Schumer-crats bring them back to caving.

You idiots voted for this!

[–] blackbearjesus27@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats stand up for something objectively good.

Gotta complain of course. Go back under your rock dude

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Democrats stand up

They already caved on Obamacare subsidies. But surely this time will be different.

[–] blackbearjesus27@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Hey I rode a bike last week and in a car today.

Two entirely different things. Whether they follow through on a nation wide shutdown (which I agree, they should not have caved) or two senators from a single state say they will not vote for something that directly harms their constituents is apples and oranges.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Did they though? They only passed a continuing resolution. They can reforce the issue with another shutdown after the average American expirences the increased healthcare premiums and after the Republicans explicitly voted against the subsidies.

Short term they look weak, long term it could work though.

Unless they just cave immediately and they had no real strategy. I can't dismiss the possibility