this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
95 points (99.0% liked)

politics

26717 readers
2207 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Access options:

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Am I having déjà vu? I could swear this just happened a few weeks back and then was reversed.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 22 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

You remember correctly. They announced a reversal and then went ahead with it anyways

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

This is 100% on the Nazis at DHS

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

[November 21st, 2025] WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Coast Guard has released a new, firmer policy addressing the display of hate symbols like swastikas and nooses just hours after it was publicly revealed that it made plans to describe them as “potentially divisive” — a term that prompted outcry from lawmakers and advocates.

“Divisive or hate symbols and flags are prohibited,” the latest Coast Guard policy,released late Thursday, declared before adding that this category included “a noose, a swastika, and any symbols or flags co-opted or adopted by hate-based groups.”

“This is not an updated policy but a new policy to combat any misinformation and double down that the U.S. Coast Guard forbids these symbols,” an accompanying Coast Guard press release said.

So there’s incompetent fuckery afoot, or they’re lying, or very likely both.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

...meanwhile, the cons are trying to root out "antisemitism" in the form of....criticizing Israel.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

That's the official definition now that the Israeli government has been pushing for almost a year, to try and shield zionists from legitimate criticism. They're trying to muddy the waters, and what it's doing is making every Jew worldwide a target, and when there are attacks of any kind, they claim anti-Semitism... Making it impossible to tell anymore what's actually anti-Semetic in general and what's intended to be anti-Israel.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I suppose they're not divisive internally if one ensures that everyone in the organisation is fucking awful in the same way.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They're divisive against the American people. Which is the point of bringing in Nazis and racists.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

I know, I was just trying to make a joke.